@TheDagery Actually I am not Christian at all, what I meant was that your comments sound like your Wikipedia and it is confusing as hell to figure out what you mean, but I want to see what your non – dumbed down comments are like, and just make multiple ones if you are concerned about the Character Limit, I do it.
@Falchion43 I’ve been dumbing down my responses given the character limit, and yet even my half-assed retorts go over your head? No wonder you haven’t bothered to venture into reading books without “Bible” in the title.
@RaReIrishman if you say catholics never believed the bible, then this Jesus charactor never existed.
Jesus’s fairy tales were told through religion after religion thousands of years prior to the old testament.
your religion is nothing but Hatred, bigotry, and manipulation of people.
you should be ashamed of yourself. supporting such a hate filled cult.
@RaReIrishman “Never have” me thinks you should check your facts again.
the only reason those psychopaths agree that the book is full of shit, is because it is!
“oh it was a metaphor” Fuck you and your metaphor BS
Jephtha, says the lord, “I will help you destroy your enemies in war, but I will need a blood sacrifice.”
Jephtha replies whomever meets me at my door after my victory, I will sacrifice to you my lord.”
guess who opened up?
his daughter 😉
guess who’s dead?
For fucks sake,I’m done looking at comments on youtube.Everytime I look to the comments to see if people perhaps thought the same funny things I might have thought,all I see is a bunch of shit that starts with ‘@suchandsuchdouchebag…” Jesus Christ it’s always just a bunch of douchebags jacking each other off.
@RaReIrishman If the Bible shouldn’t be taken literally, then where do you draw the line between myth and fact? If you think that virgin birth, rib-women and dirt-men are mere metaphors, then why do you simultaneously believe in an omnipotent, omniscient sky-man whose existence is backed by just as little evidence?
The burden of proof is on you. I don’t have to prove the nonexistence of something when there’s absolutely no evidence pointing to its existence.
@RaReIrishman Nope. Not at all. There is no cientifc or trustworthy evidence that Jesus or his disciples existed at all. Only ONE historian from their time wrote about a “savior”, but no names, disciples or miracles were included. Try harder on your research. Grettings from Brazil.
@TheDagery The disciples of Jesus knew that they would be prosecuted for spreading the news of Jesus Christ. Again, they have been confirmed, by historians, as existing and really following Jesus. Since they followed Jesus they saw his miracles. Now why would they have spread news that would get them killed if they didn’t see the miracles occur and really believe in Jesus?
@TheDagery Again, Catholics don’t take the Bible literaly and never have, it was inspired by God, but written in human words so the people of the time could understand religion better. And is there anything have written that you can prove to be factually wrong? Can you prove there is no God? Also, the followers of Jesus and Jesus have been proven to have existed by historians, what is not confirmed is if miracles were performed. Read my next coment.
@RaReIrishman You play the card of omnipotence by asserting that your god can exist outside of time, even though that was never once established by the scripture that your religion is founded upon. And for that matter, you pull out of your ass a hypothesis stating that evolution is “God’s work” even though there’s absolutely nothing on either side of the argument to support your claim.
As for the big bang: /watch?v=gs-yWMuBNr4&feature=related
@RaReIrishman You do realize that you’re doing exactly what the Catholic Church has done for centuries, right? Your on-the-spot interpretation of scripture written two millennia ago — and re-translated countless times since — is, much like the scripture itself, bunk. You claim that Catholicism shies away from biblical literalism, and yet I see millions of Catholics who believe in strict Creationism.
@TheDagery The people who followed Jesus spread his stories. Historians have confirmed that they existed but they can’t confirm Jesus performed his miracles. But why would they be so outspoken about something that will get them killed, if they didn’t truly believe it? They were alive at the time of Christ and did follow him so they saw everything he did, why would they die for something if they knew it was fake, because they were with him during most of his miracles.
@TheDagery Also, maybe humans were the first beings that God was satisfied with. Perhaps evolution is just him making small changes to beings until he made something that he was satisfied with, and he was satisfied with man. Of course he is still changing living things to make Earth a better place. I believe in evolution and the big bag theory but the question is, what caused the big band theory? Than what caused that? And that? And that? And that?
@TheDagery There is nothing that Catholics believe that is against evolution. We Catholics do not take the bible literaly because we believe it was inspired by God, but written in human words. God is outside of time so what seven days is to him could be millions of years to us. It was written that way because it was easier for the uneducated of the time to wrap their heads around seven days. Also, the Adam and Eve story is not to be taken seriously. It was just easy for people than to understand
@rocker8912 And there we have the difference between modern science and science from the 1600s. The different scientific laws are roughly the equivalent of theories. Both have been tested exhaustively, and have either shown up as true, or the conditions under which they don’t work are very rare. (The gravitational laws start to show up as false under relativistic scales)
24 comments
Skip to comment form ↓
Falchion43
March 14, 2012 at 1:44 pm (UTC 0) Link to this comment
@TheDagery Actually I am not Christian at all, what I meant was that your comments sound like your Wikipedia and it is confusing as hell to figure out what you mean, but I want to see what your non – dumbed down comments are like, and just make multiple ones if you are concerned about the Character Limit, I do it.
TheDagery
March 14, 2012 at 2:10 pm (UTC 0) Link to this comment
@Falchion43 I’ve been dumbing down my responses given the character limit, and yet even my half-assed retorts go over your head? No wonder you haven’t bothered to venture into reading books without “Bible” in the title.
Falchion43
March 14, 2012 at 2:40 pm (UTC 0) Link to this comment
@TheDagery English please?
Jaws10214
March 14, 2012 at 3:16 pm (UTC 0) Link to this comment
@RaReIrishman if you say catholics never believed the bible, then this Jesus charactor never existed.
Jesus’s fairy tales were told through religion after religion thousands of years prior to the old testament.
your religion is nothing but Hatred, bigotry, and manipulation of people.
you should be ashamed of yourself. supporting such a hate filled cult.
Jaws10214
March 14, 2012 at 4:06 pm (UTC 0) Link to this comment
@RaReIrishman “Never have” me thinks you should check your facts again.
the only reason those psychopaths agree that the book is full of shit, is because it is!
“oh it was a metaphor” Fuck you and your metaphor BS
Jephtha, says the lord, “I will help you destroy your enemies in war, but I will need a blood sacrifice.”
Jephtha replies whomever meets me at my door after my victory, I will sacrifice to you my lord.”
guess who opened up?
his daughter 😉
guess who’s dead?
adNauseum100
March 14, 2012 at 4:33 pm (UTC 0) Link to this comment
I usually find Family Guy kind of annoying, but this was funny.
mario5491
March 14, 2012 at 4:42 pm (UTC 0) Link to this comment
@RPGflend stop taking the comments so fucking seriously, it’s not like your gunna meet these people in real life so shut the fuck up we dont care
RPGfiend
March 14, 2012 at 4:47 pm (UTC 0) Link to this comment
For fucks sake,I’m done looking at comments on youtube.Everytime I look to the comments to see if people perhaps thought the same funny things I might have thought,all I see is a bunch of shit that starts with ‘@suchandsuchdouchebag…” Jesus Christ it’s always just a bunch of douchebags jacking each other off.
mario5491
March 14, 2012 at 5:28 pm (UTC 0) Link to this comment
by a goooooooooooooood
TheDagery
March 14, 2012 at 5:56 pm (UTC 0) Link to this comment
@RaReIrishman If the Bible shouldn’t be taken literally, then where do you draw the line between myth and fact? If you think that virgin birth, rib-women and dirt-men are mere metaphors, then why do you simultaneously believe in an omnipotent, omniscient sky-man whose existence is backed by just as little evidence?
The burden of proof is on you. I don’t have to prove the nonexistence of something when there’s absolutely no evidence pointing to its existence.
ztav
March 14, 2012 at 5:56 pm (UTC 0) Link to this comment
@RaReIrishman Nope. Not at all. There is no cientifc or trustworthy evidence that Jesus or his disciples existed at all. Only ONE historian from their time wrote about a “savior”, but no names, disciples or miracles were included. Try harder on your research. Grettings from Brazil.
RaReIrishman
March 14, 2012 at 6:14 pm (UTC 0) Link to this comment
@TheDagery The disciples of Jesus knew that they would be prosecuted for spreading the news of Jesus Christ. Again, they have been confirmed, by historians, as existing and really following Jesus. Since they followed Jesus they saw his miracles. Now why would they have spread news that would get them killed if they didn’t see the miracles occur and really believe in Jesus?
RaReIrishman
March 14, 2012 at 7:01 pm (UTC 0) Link to this comment
@TheDagery Again, Catholics don’t take the Bible literaly and never have, it was inspired by God, but written in human words so the people of the time could understand religion better. And is there anything have written that you can prove to be factually wrong? Can you prove there is no God? Also, the followers of Jesus and Jesus have been proven to have existed by historians, what is not confirmed is if miracles were performed. Read my next coment.
TheDagery
March 14, 2012 at 7:05 pm (UTC 0) Link to this comment
@RaReIrishman You play the card of omnipotence by asserting that your god can exist outside of time, even though that was never once established by the scripture that your religion is founded upon. And for that matter, you pull out of your ass a hypothesis stating that evolution is “God’s work” even though there’s absolutely nothing on either side of the argument to support your claim.
As for the big bang: /watch?v=gs-yWMuBNr4&feature=related
TheDagery
March 14, 2012 at 7:36 pm (UTC 0) Link to this comment
@RaReIrishman You do realize that you’re doing exactly what the Catholic Church has done for centuries, right? Your on-the-spot interpretation of scripture written two millennia ago — and re-translated countless times since — is, much like the scripture itself, bunk. You claim that Catholicism shies away from biblical literalism, and yet I see millions of Catholics who believe in strict Creationism.
RaReIrishman
March 14, 2012 at 8:14 pm (UTC 0) Link to this comment
@TheDagery The people who followed Jesus spread his stories. Historians have confirmed that they existed but they can’t confirm Jesus performed his miracles. But why would they be so outspoken about something that will get them killed, if they didn’t truly believe it? They were alive at the time of Christ and did follow him so they saw everything he did, why would they die for something if they knew it was fake, because they were with him during most of his miracles.
RaReIrishman
March 14, 2012 at 8:30 pm (UTC 0) Link to this comment
@TheDagery Also, maybe humans were the first beings that God was satisfied with. Perhaps evolution is just him making small changes to beings until he made something that he was satisfied with, and he was satisfied with man. Of course he is still changing living things to make Earth a better place. I believe in evolution and the big bag theory but the question is, what caused the big band theory? Than what caused that? And that? And that? And that?
RaReIrishman
March 14, 2012 at 8:31 pm (UTC 0) Link to this comment
@TheDagery There is nothing that Catholics believe that is against evolution. We Catholics do not take the bible literaly because we believe it was inspired by God, but written in human words. God is outside of time so what seven days is to him could be millions of years to us. It was written that way because it was easier for the uneducated of the time to wrap their heads around seven days. Also, the Adam and Eve story is not to be taken seriously. It was just easy for people than to understand
denizg6
March 14, 2012 at 8:36 pm (UTC 0) Link to this comment
@TheDagery its been proved you just don’t understand
TheIndianPython
March 14, 2012 at 9:05 pm (UTC 0) Link to this comment
lol, I love how as soon as someone posts a slightly religious video, everyone becomes a Biology/Physics professor
Keairan3
March 14, 2012 at 9:28 pm (UTC 0) Link to this comment
@rocker8912 And there we have the difference between modern science and science from the 1600s. The different scientific laws are roughly the equivalent of theories. Both have been tested exhaustively, and have either shown up as true, or the conditions under which they don’t work are very rare. (The gravitational laws start to show up as false under relativistic scales)
GregoryMoncayo
March 14, 2012 at 10:14 pm (UTC 0) Link to this comment
GAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWDDDD bang.
debjoy12
March 14, 2012 at 10:26 pm (UTC 0) Link to this comment
it’s clear by the use of carbon-dating that MOUNTAIN DEW IS THE NEST SODA EVER MADE.
Leanashe23
March 14, 2012 at 11:05 pm (UTC 0) Link to this comment
I believe in the theory of evolution.. I mean, how else could Charmander become Charizard!?